pros and cons of cinahl databasepros and cons of cinahl database

0000007203 00000 n 0000254545 00000 n 0000280491 00000 n to search for the article in other databases. Ideally a planned future analysis would be based upon prospective data so these factors and their impact can be considered. 2005 [8] found Qual Health Res. Mindfulness. PubMedGoogle Scholar. J Med Libr Assoc. Research Article: Research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions. PubMed WebWith CINAHL Complete, users get fast and easy full-text access to top nursing journals, evidence-based care sheets, quick lessons and more. Peer Reviewed, which limits your search results to materials published in peer-reviewed journals. In particular, we planned to identify the percentage of included studies available in CINAHL and the percentage of the included studies unique to the CINAHL database. 2012;25(5):36375. Web1 Databases found for cinahl Clear Filters/Browse All Databases CINAHL Plus with Full Text This resource provides access to journals from the fields of nursing and allied health. 2012;21(3):27484. Article 2012;22(8):11509. Database descriptions provided by database producers may list the subject areas covered but tend to provide less information about coverage in terms of methodological types. 2011;85:31522. Treloar C, Rhodes T. The lived experience of hepatitis C and its treatment among injecting drug users: qualitative synthesis. The two sides of managing antidepressants: a meta-ethnography of patients experience of antidepressants. See this image and copyright information in PMC. A very different picture emerges for the Cochrane library . Before 0000003659 00000 n Click on any of the database links listed under the Full Text (Online) heading to gain access to an article. Smithson J, Paterson C, Britten N, Evans M, Lewith G. Cancer patients' experiences of using complementary therapies: polarization and integration. Speed- Azure SQL Databases are quickly set up. 2021 Nov;14(6):719-740. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00514-2. 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5. Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. While identifying the evidence for reviews of quantitative evidence synthesis, emphasises the importance of finding all the available studies [13]; searching for evidence in reviews of qualitative evidence can have a different aim. For all 43 reviews (21 %) in our sample, we found that some of the included studies were available in CINAHL. For each review, we extracted the following: review details, publication year, number of included studies, how many databases searched, percentage of potentially included studies available from CINAHL, percentage of unique studies available from CINAHL and whether any other sources were used to identify studies. trailer The lack of access to a number of the databases that had been used by the original reviews limits how confident we can be about whether the CINAHL database can identify unique studies for systematic reviews of qualitative studies in topic areas beyond nursing. Plos One. 0000014545 00000 n The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Where the full-text is not held, you can use the, One of Charles Sturt'sGraduate Learning Outcomes is that graduates should be able to demonstrate capability as inquirers to locate, evaluate, manage, and use information and research . We suggest that as Allied Health students and, eventually, graduates, you should be familiar with an important research database such as, There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. 0000041635 00000 n This could suggest that, when seeking to identify qualitative research studies, CINAHL may be a better choice of database than MEDLINE. government site. If you do not check this box, your results will include articles from publications that do not go through the peer-review process. While we found some indication that CINAHL had the potential to provide unique studies for systematic reviews, we could only fully test this on a limited number of reviews, so we are less confident about this finding. albert einstein hospital bronx, ny directions Case studies have suggested that using CINAHL could be essential for reviews of qualitative studies covering topics in the nursing field, but it is unclear whether this can be extended more generally to reviews of qualitative studies in other topic areas. The easiest way to connect to CINAHL is through the Nursing subject guide. 0000006966 00000 n In most instances, the most relevant term will be at the top of the list. Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Nagata JM, Gatti LR, Barg FK. CINAHL uses some subject headings that include acronyms at the end of the heading, such as Sensory-Perceptual Alterations (NANDA) or Risk Identification (Iowa NOC). We later combined these results with those from the ten reviews initially used in the feasibility study so that we had a total of 43 reviews for analysis as shown in Fig. What are good pros/cons for using a single or multiple databases? Several reviews utilised more than one supplementary search technique. In particular, we wanted to assess, What percentage of included studies were available in CINAHL, What percentage of the included studies were unique to CINAHL. Reference checking/footnote chasing was the most frequently mentioned activity (20 reports) (46.5 %) followed by citation searching (described in a variety of ways including forward citation chasing, ancestry searching, citation tracking and backchaining) (10 reports) (23.3 %) and then handsearching key journals and contacting authors (both 8 reports) (18.6 %). Performance of conceptual framework elements for the retrieval of qualitative health literature: a case study. Kunzler-Heule P, Panfil E. Hepatitis C! 0000148768 00000 n 0000004921 00000 n 2017 Dec 6;6(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. UoD subscription is the same supplier as CINAHL so easy to run joint searches and to switch between databases. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Google Scholar. King K, Meader N, Wright K, Graham H, Power C, Petticrew M et al.Characteristics of interventions targeting multiple lifestyle risk behaviours in adult populations: a systematic scoping review. 0000016000 00000 n This site needs JavaScript to work properly. As all the search strategies were not given in full, there was not sufficient information to base our analysis upon their performance in terms of sensitivity, precision and number needed to read (NRR), so we had to use the availability of records within CINAHL and the other databases as a measure of performance. Washington D.C: Institute of Medicine; 2011. However, 7 (38.9 %) of these 18 reviews, where one or more unique studies was available in CINAHL, had originally searched additional databases that we could not access either because they were no longer available or required a subscription. how should we conduct systematic reviews of qualitative research? 2003;25(2):15378. The experiences of commercial kidney donors: thematic synthesis of qualitative research. Int J Qual Health Care. Int J Evid Based Healthc. Pros: A good way of getting articles on a subject with lots of different synonyms. PubMed However, remember to choose limiters sparingly and with caution! CINAHL includes rigorous curation and indexing of open access (OA) journals, which has resulted in a growing collection of 1,361 active global OA journals. Assuming a rigorous search strategy was used and the records sought were accurately indexed, we could expect CINAHL to be a good source of primary studies PubMed is a very handy, quick, and easy to use. 0000007599 00000 n 0000271213 00000 n Syst Rev 4, 104 (2015). 0000275139 00000 n This can be offset, as noted above, by going to the. CINAHL is a database that indexes journals, books, audiovisuals, pamphlets, software, dissertations, and research instruments in all of the allied health professions. The small group of reviews investigates topics covering an equally wide range of topic areas as examined by the overall sample as follows: experiences of breastfeeding, old peoples experience of dependency, fathers experience of birth, patient experience of being in isolation, preoperative communication and occupational therapy home visits. 2012;21(5/6):81224. Duplications with CINAHL, PubMed **** PubMed General EbscoHOST platform (cross databases) Includes these and many more (Click "Choose Databases" beneath the top blue ribbon in any EbscoHOST database to see the complete list): Academic Search Premier (general), AgeLine, CINAHL (Nursing & Allied Health), Education Full Text, ERIC (Education), Global Health, APA Psyc databases, Social York: CRD, University of York; 2009. The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) is generally thought to be a good source to search when conducting a review of qualitative evidence. Assuming a rigorous search strategy was used and the records sought were accurately indexed, we could expect CINAHL to be a good source of primary studies for qualitative evidence syntheses. 0000271252 00000 n The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Write by: Subject terms are one of the best ways to find research on a specific topic. Subirana M, Sola I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrutia G. A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. Clinical Obesity. 2012;22(7):897910. 0000163738 00000 n Steen M, Downe S, Bamford N, Edozien L. Not-patient and not-visitor: a metasynthesis fathers' encounters with pregnancy, birth and maternity care. 0000280766 00000 n WebMost databases use their own specific thesaurus of subject terms which reflect their country of origin and professional focus. PubMed 0000275839 00000 n While the aim is to identify specific groups of papers that possess characteristics that are relevant to the phenomenon being studied, this need not imply statistical representativeness. A retrospective analysis of the performance of one or more databases as a source of potential studies for a systematic review requires more detailed reporting than is presently available in published reports. Following this finding, we decided to undertake a retrospective analysis of a group of systematic reviews of qualitative studies to investigate CINAHLs potential contribution in more detail. The median % of unique studies was 9.09 %; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % to the highest value of 33.0 %. PubMed is adatabase that indexes journal articles in the life sciences, concentrating on biomedical information. Extremely Flexible- You have the ability to increase and decrease the performance resources as needed without taking a downtime or other burden. Higgins J, Green S, (editors). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0069-4, http://phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/project_2011-2016_002.html, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/AboutPage.asp, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001724.htm, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0128-x, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. We also used this test set to ensure that there was consistency between the four information specialists carrying out the assessment and data extraction. Life expectancy in the United States has jumped from 47 years in 1900 to 78 years as reported in 2009, and disability in people over 2011;17(4):32331. Smithson J, Britten N, Paterson C, Lewith G, Evans M. The experience of using complementary therapies after a diagnosis of cancer: a qualitative synthesis. Tonkin-Crine S, Yardley L, Little P. Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: a systematic review and meta-ethnography. Participating in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data. Consequently, for a total of 30 reviews, or 70 % of our sample, 80 % or more of the studies could be identified using CINAHL alone. Qual Health Res. An official website of the United States government. J Adv Nurs. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination . Underneath this heading, you will find a list of the most useful databases for nursing. [68] describes this as Their intention is not to identify all literature on a particular topic. AccessLibrary and Research Help tutorials. Am J Kidney Dis. Consequently, the findings regarding CINAHLs contribution of unique studies can only be based on 11 (61.0 %) of the 18 reviews (see Additional file 3: Table S3, Number of databases not available for searching). 0000024275 00000 n Robinson L, Spilsbury K. Systematic review of the perceptions and experiences of accessing health services by adult victims of domestic violence. Gomersall T, Madill A, Summers LK. We did not investigate the reviews that had not used CINAHL as one of the databases for their search. MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB Pros and Cons. PubMed is created and is maintained by theNational Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health, and contains all of the citations in Medline, plus additional citations and services. Epub 2021 Apr 19. Performance Responsiveness, efficient utilization of resources, etc. 0000281543 00000 n Br J Psychiatry. 0000034354 00000 n 0000280205 00000 n The content is broken down into small chunks, designed to accommodate the busiest schedules as well as provide easy reference. Google Scholar. Webpros and cons of cinahl databasemr patel neurosurgeon cardiff 27 februari, 2023 / i how old was stewart granger when he died / av / i how old was stewart granger when he died / av During this second-stage checking, we did identify a number of subscription-only databases that we did not have access to such as CAB Abstracts, SocIndex, Ageline, Health Source Nursing, Academic Search Complete, ProQuest (Dissertations and Theses), PsycARTICLES, Current Contents Connect, Journals@OVID, Sociofile, OTseeker, OT database, Dissertation Abstracts and MIDIRS database. Living well in care homes: a systematic review of qualitative studies. 0000005436 00000 n 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. For medline 26% were unaware. 0000163150 00000 n 0000004148 00000 n NOTE: EBSCOhostdatabases andEBSCO Discovery Servicegenerate a lot more referrals for DOAJ than any other online platform. Experience of rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. 2007 Jan;57(1):95-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04083.x. Harrison Dening K, Jones L, Sampson EL. 0000279310 00000 n 0000012449 00000 n 0000007756 00000 n As our study was a retrospective audit of the search methods of a sample of systematic reviews of qualitative studies undertaken by other researchers, we did not have access to the original search results and search strategies. For all 43 reviews, we found that some of the included studies were available in CINAHL (see Fig. Radiography. 2011;18(6):48792. Shaw RL, Booth A, Sutton AJ, Miller T, Smith JA, Young B et al. Malpass A, Carel H, Ridd M, Shaw A, Kessler D, Sharp D, et al. Kath Wright. 2012;91(11):98498. 0 The databases that produced these were Embase (3), MEDLINE (2), PsycINFO (1) and SCI (3) while CINAHL did not produce any unique studies. One could argue that an approach is chosen to serve a need/requirement. By using this website, you agree to our Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. Disabil Rehabil. If ProQuest tips the balance of BNI's database content any further in the direction of international journal titles, they may become a UK database only in name and risk losing the UK nursing database market to the better established and more expansive CINAHL. %PDF-1.4 % Steen et al. Lundgren I, Begley C, Gross MM, Bondas T. 'Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section). 0000008703 00000 n This guide concentrates on CINAHL because it's probably the best known database for Allied Health. National Library of Medicine Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley WebA: Code is ok. here is code again. Other methods mentioned were scanning conference proceedings, contacting professional bodies, searching for grey literature and looking at the included studies of earlier reviews. 2005;25(1):205. PLoS One. Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley CINAHL indexes the top nursing and allied health literature available including nursing journals and publications from the National League for Nursing and the American Nurses Association. BMC Med Res Methodol. It provides Soc Sci Med. It has tools and features that are specific to the health sciences. Disadvantages of using CINAHL. A: Fusion loop: A computer optimization and loop transformation is called loop The work presented here was undertaken independently by the authors. 0000254490 00000 n Children's experiences of dialysis: a systematic review of qualitative studies. 341 SCIENTIFIC DATABASES, PROS AND CONS. CINAHL and PubMedare often searched for similar material, so this guide presents concepts essential to both. 2012;49(12):158297. Webpros and cons of cinahl database. The site is secure. : 07-0087. Erratum to: What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies? A: Fusion loop: A computer optimization and loop transformation is called loop 0000041681 00000 n Scalability The ability to scale on demand. 2012;68(9):190919. Smithson J, Garside R, Pearson M. Barriers to, and facilitators of, the prevention of unintentional injury in children in the home: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. 2012;201(5):34451. Pros and Cons. Watch video to learn more. Health. Break your topic into individual concepts, such as the problem The main focus of the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Plus) is nursing, along with biomedicine, health sciences librarianship, alternative/complementary medicine, consumer health and 17 allied health disciplines. When we analysed which databases had contributed to the included studies and which of these were unique, we found that (of the 53 potentially included studies) 43 (81.13 %) of the papers were available from Embase (accessed via OVIDSP and including MEDLINE records), 39 (73.58 %) were available from MEDLINE (accessed via OVIDSP), 36 (67.92 %) from CINAHL (accessed via EBSCO) and 26 (49.05 %) were available from either PsycINFO (accessed via OVIDSP) or Science Citation Index (SCI) (accessed via Web of Science). Introduction to the Library and Library Research by Margaret Vail and Karina Espinosa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. When we re-checked these thesaurus terms in 2014 against both the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and the CINAHL thesaurus, we found that there was no substantial change i.e., there were a significant group of terms describing qualitative research that were available in CINAHL but not in MEDLINE. Wilczynski NL, Marks S, Haynes RB. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Mentrup S, Schnepp W. The experience and coping of primary coronary intervention: a review of qualitative studies. 294 0 obj <> endobj 0000020295 00000 n Database coverage and their use in systematic reviews regarding spinal manipulative therapy: an exploratory study. 2009;68(1):15468. If you are off-campus, you will be prompted to login to the librarys proxy server to authenticate yourself as a StFX user. Once validated and certified for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, precise/accuratefull-textlinking.

Is Peter's Italian Restaurant Still Open, Peter Goodwin Charlottesville, End Of Year Awards Ceremony Speech, Red Rock Casino Restaurants Gordon Ramsay, Articles P